I can remember way back when how amazed I was to order a new desktop computer with 2MB of RAM. Even the days of ordering a server with 64MB of RAM seemed like sooooo much memory. And in case you missed it, those are values in megabytes. Naturally today’s systems are in another class altogether. And while I’d like to think the quality of memory manufacturing has also increased over the years, things can still go wrong.
Failing or faulty memory doesn’t always manifest itself with a huge announcement. In the event that Windows 7 or Windows Server 2008 detects such a problem, it will most likely prompt you to run the Windows Memory Diagnostic tool. But you can also manually run this tool anytime you’d like if you prefer to be a bit more proactive.
本日志由 flyinweb 于 2012-01-30 10:39:19 发表到 技术文摘 中,目前已经被浏览 354 次,评论 0 次;
作者添加了以下标签: Windws内存诊断工具,windows memory diagnostic tool;
首页只显示了部分日志内容,要查看日志的全部内容请阅读全文;
而且直接配置文件是效率最高的,通过其它驱动效率都相对较低,BDB
这个测试不太准确,看官方的测试结果:http://bind-dlz.sourceforg
为什么使用BDB时QPS这么低? 我在bind版本基本相似的环境中测试的
It is quite useful and interesting too.
VIRT 的上限是64G,也就是36位, cat /proc/cpuinfo的结果是:addre
昨天要准备用线程重写webbench,试验了下Fedora Linux 2.6.35.14
不明白您的具体的意思是什么?
已经发送到你QQ邮箱